Uses the existing site header template. Only change: the button reads "Get your report" and jumps to the form instead of "Request demo." The "Learn about Healthcare Systems Solutions" link is an exit link. Best practice on a campaign page is to remove it or at least open it in a new tab, so readers don't leave before requesting. Logo here is cropped from a screenshot; the template's real asset replaces it.
A Louisiana health system couldn't see the outpatient cardiac activity leaving its network in their state data. Once it could, the picture changed dramatically. Get your own free leakage report on where your patients go. Have a JV? We can break out the cases going to your partner's sites.
Layout B puts the form beside the story from the first screen and keeps it pinned while the reader scrolls. The reader never has to hunt for the ask or scroll back to find it. Everything in the left column argues for the form on the right.
Executives skim. This strip tells the whole story in three lines for readers who won't scroll the narrative.
The system had a joint venture with a large, influential cardiac practice that runs an ambulatory surgery center. Leadership needed to know three things: how many and what kinds of cases were going to the ASC, whether their provider relationships held up, and whether the JV was still on solid footing.
Their market intelligence came from state data, which leaves out outpatient claims. That's a big blind spot, since cardiology procedures routinely happen in ASCs and outpatient labs instead of a hospital OR. The cases that mattered most to the JV question were the ones the team couldn't see.
More major cardiac events than state data showed. This wasn't growth. It was care happening outside their line of sight.
The referral relationships. Leadership could see which providers referred cardiac cases and where those patients went.
The visible leakage. The team could name the specific procedures leaving the system, the providers referring them out, and where those patients got care.
With the more complete baseline, the team could answer the JV question with evidence: was the leakage a threat, or just the ASC doing its job? Now they know which referral ties to protect, and which to focus on first.
De-identified claims filled in the ambulatory and outpatient activity that state data leaves out. In cardiology, that's where more and more of the volume is.
Wayfinder DataSync joined the system's own operational and billing data with external claims into one analysis-ready foundation right in their existing enterprise environment.
Privacy-preserving tokenization and Patient Mastering, built for HIPAA contexts, link each patient's care across providers and sites. That's how a referral out becomes visible.
The strategy team queried referral sources, sites of care, procedures and leakage directly, and kept asking new questions as findings surfaced. Watch the 3-minute demo
Demo opens in an on-page popup (Rob's version), so no one leaves the page. If the popup can't be built, cut the link. Condensed copy from Layout A to fit the narrower column.
One sample report found $2.3B in care delivered outside the network over a 3 year period. Built for your market, on the same patient-level claims foundation behind this case study. Free, and walked through live by an analyst.
Swap the thumbnail for a real screenshot of the sample report. Showing the deliverable right before the steps answers "what do I actually get?"
We reach out within one business day to book a 30-minute scoping call.
Agree on the service line, the geography and the decision you're weighing.
Two weeks later, an analyst walks your team through the report live.
Yes. No trial, no contract. The report is yours either way.
One 30-minute call to pick the service line and geography. No data sharing, no IT work, no extra forms.
It's built on the same patient-level claims foundation, for your market. The case study also used the system's own internal data. Your report uses external claims only, so there's nothing for you to send.
FAQ collapsed to save space. The third question answers the honest-framing issue head on: same foundation, not the same results.